1997 Ford Puma vs. 1989 Mazda 323
To start off, 1997 Ford Puma is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Mazda 323. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Mazda 323 would be higher. At 1,498 cc (4 cylinders), 1989 Mazda 323 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1989 Mazda 323 (110 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 21 more horse power than 1997 Ford Puma. (89 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1989 Mazda 323 should accelerate faster than 1997 Ford Puma.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, both vehicles can yield 126 Nm of torque. So under normal driving conditions, the ability to climb up hills and pull heavy equipment should be relatively similar for both vehicles.
Compare all specifications:
1997 Ford Puma | 1989 Mazda 323 | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | Puma | 323 |
Year Released | 1997 | 1989 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1388 cc | 1498 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 110 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 126 Nm | 126 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 76 mm | 78 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 76.5 mm | 78.4 mm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3990 mm | 4270 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2510 mm |