1997 Ford Puma vs. 1990 Opel Omega
To start off, 1997 Ford Puma is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1990 Opel Omega. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1990 Opel Omega would be higher. At 2,594 cc (6 cylinders), 1990 Opel Omega is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1990 Opel Omega (149 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 26 more horse power than 1997 Ford Puma. (123 HP @ 6300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1990 Opel Omega should accelerate faster than 1997 Ford Puma. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1990 Opel Omega weights approximately 405 kg more than 1997 Ford Puma. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1990 Opel Omega (224 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 67 more torque (in Nm) than 1997 Ford Puma. (157 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 1990 Opel Omega will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1997 Ford Puma.
Compare all specifications:
1997 Ford Puma | 1990 Opel Omega | |
Make | Ford | Opel |
Model | Puma | Omega |
Year Released | 1997 | 1990 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1679 cc | 2594 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 149 HP |
Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 157 Nm | 224 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1060 kg | 1465 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3990 mm | 4740 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1490 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2740 mm |