1997 Ford Puma vs. 1991 Mitsubishi Sigma
To start off, 1997 Ford Puma is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Mitsubishi Sigma. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Mitsubishi Sigma would be higher. At 2,972 cc (6 cylinders), 1991 Mitsubishi Sigma is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1991 Mitsubishi Sigma (202 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 79 more horse power than 1997 Ford Puma. (123 HP @ 6300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1991 Mitsubishi Sigma should accelerate faster than 1997 Ford Puma. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1991 Mitsubishi Sigma weights approximately 520 kg more than 1997 Ford Puma. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1991 Mitsubishi Sigma (270 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 113 more torque (in Nm) than 1997 Ford Puma. (157 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 1991 Mitsubishi Sigma will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1997 Ford Puma.
Compare all specifications:
1997 Ford Puma | 1991 Mitsubishi Sigma | |
Make | Ford | Mitsubishi |
Model | Puma | Sigma |
Year Released | 1997 | 1991 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1679 cc | 2972 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 202 HP |
Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 157 Nm | 270 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1060 kg | 1580 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3990 mm | 4760 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2730 mm |