1997 Ford Puma vs. 1991 Volvo 245
To start off, 1997 Ford Puma is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Volvo 245. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Volvo 245 would be higher. At 2,383 cc (6 cylinders), 1991 Volvo 245 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Ford Puma (123 HP) has 42 more horse power than 1991 Volvo 245. (81 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1997 Ford Puma should accelerate faster than 1991 Volvo 245.
Because 1991 Volvo 245 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1991 Volvo 245. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Ford Puma, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1997 Ford Puma (157 Nm) has 14 more torque (in Nm) than 1991 Volvo 245. (143 Nm). This means 1997 Ford Puma will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1991 Volvo 245.
Compare all specifications:
1997 Ford Puma | 1991 Volvo 245 | |
Make | Ford | Volvo |
Model | Puma | 245 |
Year Released | 1997 | 1991 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1679 cc | 2383 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 81 HP |
Torque | 157 Nm | 143 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 3990 mm | 4790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2660 mm |