1997 Ford Puma vs. 1992 Rover 216
To start off, 1997 Ford Puma is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Rover 216. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Rover 216 would be higher. At 1,679 cc (4 cylinders), 1997 Ford Puma is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Ford Puma (123 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 1 more horse power than 1992 Rover 216. (122 HP @ 6800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1997 Ford Puma should accelerate faster than 1992 Rover 216. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Rover 216 weights approximately 30 kg more than 1997 Ford Puma.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1997 Ford Puma (157 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 17 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Rover 216. (140 Nm @ 5700 RPM). This means 1997 Ford Puma will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Rover 216.
Compare all specifications:
1997 Ford Puma | 1992 Rover 216 | |
Make | Ford | Rover |
Model | Puma | 216 |
Year Released | 1997 | 1992 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1679 cc | 1590 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 122 HP |
Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 6800 RPM |
Torque | 157 Nm | 140 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 5700 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1060 kg | 1090 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3990 mm | 4260 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2560 mm |