1997 Ford Puma vs. 2001 Toyota Pod
To start off, 2001 Toyota Pod is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Ford Puma. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Ford Puma would be higher. At 1,495 cc (4 cylinders), 2001 Toyota Pod is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Toyota Pod (201 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 112 more horse power than 1997 Ford Puma. (89 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Toyota Pod should accelerate faster than 1997 Ford Puma. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Ford Puma weights approximately 66 kg more than 2001 Toyota Pod.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Toyota Pod (430 Nm) has 304 more torque (in Nm) than 1997 Ford Puma. (126 Nm). This means 2001 Toyota Pod will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1997 Ford Puma.
Compare all specifications:
1997 Ford Puma | 2001 Toyota Pod | |
Make | Ford | Toyota |
Model | Puma | Pod |
Year Released | 1997 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1388 cc | 1495 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 201 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 126 Nm | 430 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 76 mm | 75 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 76.5 mm | 84.7 mm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1010 kg | 944 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3990 mm | 3940 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1870 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2440 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 42 L | 55 L |