1997 Ford Puma vs. 2002 Ford Windstar
To start off, 2002 Ford Windstar is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Ford Puma. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Ford Puma would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Ford Windstar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Ford Windstar (150 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 27 more horse power than 1997 Ford Puma. (123 HP @ 6300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Ford Windstar should accelerate faster than 1997 Ford Puma.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1997 Ford Puma | 2002 Ford Windstar | |
| Make | Ford | Ford |
| Model | Puma | Windstar |
| Year Released | 1997 | 2002 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Minivan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1679 cc | 3000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 123 HP | 150 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Length | 3990 mm | 5103 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1946 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1679 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 3066 mm |
