1997 Ford Puma vs. 2004 Toyota Corolla
To start off, 2004 Toyota Corolla is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Ford Puma. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Ford Puma would be higher. At 1,679 cc (4 cylinders), 1997 Ford Puma is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Toyota Corolla (194 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 71 more horse power than 1997 Ford Puma. (123 HP @ 6300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Toyota Corolla should accelerate faster than 1997 Ford Puma. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Ford Puma weights approximately 120 kg more than 2004 Toyota Corolla.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Toyota Corolla (260 Nm) has 103 more torque (in Nm) than 1997 Ford Puma. (157 Nm). This means 2004 Toyota Corolla will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1997 Ford Puma.
Compare all specifications:
| 1997 Ford Puma | 2004 Toyota Corolla | |
| Make | Ford | Toyota |
| Model | Puma | Corolla |
| Year Released | 1997 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1679 cc | 1587 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 123 HP | 194 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Torque | 157 Nm | 260 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1060 kg | 940 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2630 mm |
