1997 Ford Puma vs. 2011 Mitsubishi i-MiEV
To start off, 2011 Mitsubishi i-MiEV is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Ford Puma. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Ford Puma would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Mitsubishi i-MiEV weights approximately 70 kg more than 1997 Ford Puma.
Because 2011 Mitsubishi i-MiEV is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2011 Mitsubishi i-MiEV. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Ford Puma, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1997 Ford Puma | 2011 Mitsubishi i-MiEV | |
| Make | Ford | Mitsubishi |
| Model | Puma | i-MiEV |
| Year Released | 1997 | 2011 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Horse Power | 89 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Electric |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Single Speed |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1010 kg | 1080 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3990 mm | 3395 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1475 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1600 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2550 mm |
