1997 Ford Ranger vs. 1953 Holden FX
To start off, 1997 Ford Ranger is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Holden FX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Holden FX would be higher. At 2,507 cc (4 cylinders), 1997 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Ford Ranger (118 HP) has 67 more horse power than 1953 Holden FX. (51 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1997 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1953 Holden FX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Ford Ranger weights approximately 425 kg more than 1953 Holden FX. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1997 Ford Ranger (198 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 62 more torque (in Nm) than 1953 Holden FX. (136 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 1997 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1953 Holden FX.
Compare all specifications:
1997 Ford Ranger | 1953 Holden FX | |
Make | Ford | Holden |
Model | Ranger | FX |
Year Released | 1997 | 1953 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2507 cc | 2166 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 118 HP | 51 HP |
Torque | 198 Nm | 136 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1395 kg | 970 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 4380 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1650 mm | 1580 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2620 mm |