1997 Ford Ranger vs. 1974 Reliant Rebel

To start off, 1997 Ford Ranger is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Reliant Rebel. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Reliant Rebel would be higher. At 2,507 cc (4 cylinders), 1997 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Ford Ranger (118 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 87 more horse power than 1974 Reliant Rebel. (31 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1997 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1974 Reliant Rebel. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Ford Ranger weights approximately 820 kg more than 1974 Reliant Rebel. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1997 Ford Ranger (198 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 146 more torque (in Nm) than 1974 Reliant Rebel. (52 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1997 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1974 Reliant Rebel.

Compare all specifications:

1997 Ford Ranger 1974 Reliant Rebel
Make Ford Reliant
Model Ranger Rebel
Year Released 1997 1974
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2507 cc 701 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 118 HP 31 HP
Engine RPM 5000 RPM 5000 RPM
Torque 198 Nm 52 Nm
Torque RPM 3000 RPM 3000 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Rear
Vehicle Weight 1395 kg 575 kg
Vehicle Length 4770 mm 3510 mm
Vehicle Width 1770 mm 1480 mm
Vehicle Height 1650 mm 1420 mm
Wheelbase Size 2840 mm 2270 mm