1997 Ford Ranger vs. 1981 Mitsubishi Colt
To start off, 1997 Ford Ranger is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Mitsubishi Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Mitsubishi Colt would be higher. At 2,507 cc (4 cylinders), 1997 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Ford Ranger weights approximately 585 kg more than 1981 Mitsubishi Colt.
Because 1997 Ford Ranger is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1997 Ford Ranger. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1981 Mitsubishi Colt, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1997 Ford Ranger | 1981 Mitsubishi Colt | |
Make | Ford | Mitsubishi |
Model | Ranger | Colt |
Year Released | 1997 | 1981 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2507 cc | 1244 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 118 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1395 kg | 810 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 3800 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1590 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1650 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2310 mm |