1997 Ford Ranger vs. 2004 Ford Mustang

To start off, 2004 Ford Mustang is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Ford Ranger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Ford Ranger would be higher. At 4,605 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford Mustang (260 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 142 more horse power than 1997 Ford Ranger. (118 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1997 Ford Ranger. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford Mustang weights approximately 123 kg more than 1997 Ford Ranger. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford Mustang (411 Nm) has 213 more torque (in Nm) than 1997 Ford Ranger. (198 Nm). This means 2004 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1997 Ford Ranger.

Compare all specifications:

1997 Ford Ranger 2004 Ford Mustang
Make Ford Ford
Model Ranger Mustang
Year Released 1997 2004
Body Type Pickup Coupe
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2507 cc 4605 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Horse Power 118 HP 260 HP
Engine RPM 5000 RPM 6000 RPM
Torque 198 Nm 411 Nm
Drive Type Rear Rear
Number of Seats 4 seats 4 seats
Vehicle Weight 1395 kg 1518 kg
Vehicle Length 4770 mm 4660 mm
Vehicle Width 1770 mm 1860 mm
Vehicle Height 1650 mm 1360 mm
Wheelbase Size 2840 mm 2630 mm