1997 Ford Ranger vs. 2010 Holden Calais
To start off, 2010 Holden Calais is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Ford Ranger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Ford Ranger would be higher. At 6,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Holden Calais is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Holden Calais (344 HP) has 226 more horse power than 1997 Ford Ranger. (118 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Holden Calais should accelerate faster than 1997 Ford Ranger.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Holden Calais (530 Nm) has 332 more torque (in Nm) than 1997 Ford Ranger. (198 Nm). This means 2010 Holden Calais will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1997 Ford Ranger.
Compare all specifications:
| 1997 Ford Ranger | 2010 Holden Calais | |
| Make | Ford | Holden |
| Model | Ranger | Calais |
| Year Released | 1997 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Pickup | Station Wagon |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2507 cc | 6000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 118 HP | 344 HP |
| Torque | 198 Nm | 530 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
