1997 Ford Royale vs. 1992 Plymouth Colt
To start off, 1997 Ford Royale is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Plymouth Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Plymouth Colt would be higher. At 1,984 cc (4 cylinders), 1997 Ford Royale is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Plymouth Colt (111 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 2 more horse power than 1997 Ford Royale. (109 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1992 Plymouth Colt should accelerate faster than 1997 Ford Royale.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1997 Ford Royale (173 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 16 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Plymouth Colt. (157 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 1997 Ford Royale will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Plymouth Colt.
Compare all specifications:
1997 Ford Royale | 1992 Plymouth Colt | |
Make | Ford | Plymouth |
Model | Royale | Colt |
Year Released | 1997 | 1992 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1984 cc | 1834 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 109 HP | 111 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 173 Nm | 157 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Length | 4610 mm | 4290 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1660 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2530 mm |