1997 Ford Royale vs. 1996 Rover 200
To start off, 1997 Ford Royale is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Rover 200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Rover 200 would be higher. At 1,984 cc (4 cylinders), 1997 Ford Royale is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Ford Royale (109 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 7 more horse power than 1996 Rover 200. (102 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1997 Ford Royale should accelerate faster than 1996 Rover 200.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1997 Ford Royale (173 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 46 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Rover 200. (127 Nm @ 5000 RPM). This means 1997 Ford Royale will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Rover 200.
Compare all specifications:
1997 Ford Royale | 1996 Rover 200 | |
Make | Ford | Rover |
Model | Royale | 200 |
Year Released | 1997 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1984 cc | 1395 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 109 HP | 102 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 173 Nm | 127 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4610 mm | 3980 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2510 mm |