1997 Ford Royale vs. 2011 Toyota Matrix
To start off, 2011 Toyota Matrix is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Ford Royale. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Ford Royale would be higher. At 1,984 cc (4 cylinders), 1997 Ford Royale is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Toyota Matrix (132 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 23 more horse power than 1997 Ford Royale. (109 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Toyota Matrix should accelerate faster than 1997 Ford Royale.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, both vehicles can yield 173 Nm of torque. So under normal driving conditions, the ability to climb up hills and pull heavy equipment should be relatively similar for both vehicles.
Compare all specifications:
1997 Ford Royale | 2011 Toyota Matrix | |
Make | Ford | Toyota |
Model | Royale | Matrix |
Year Released | 1997 | 2011 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1984 cc | 1800 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 109 HP | 132 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 173 Nm | 173 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4610 mm | 4366 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1765 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1549 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2601 mm |