1997 Ford Scorpio vs. 2001 Renault Clio
To start off, 2001 Renault Clio is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Ford Scorpio. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Ford Scorpio would be higher. At 2,946 cc (6 cylinders), 2001 Renault Clio is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Renault Clio (230 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 107 more horse power than 1997 Ford Scorpio. (123 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 1997 Ford Scorpio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Renault Clio weights approximately 144 kg more than 1997 Ford Scorpio. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1997 Ford Scorpio (293 Nm) has 188 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Renault Clio. (105 Nm). This means 1997 Ford Scorpio will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
| 1997 Ford Scorpio | 2001 Renault Clio | |
| Make | Ford | Renault |
| Model | Scorpio | Clio |
| Year Released | 1997 | 2001 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 2499 cc | 2946 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 123 HP | 230 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 5250 RPM |
| Torque | 293 Nm | 105 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1556 kg | 1700 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4830 mm | 3820 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1810 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1380 mm |
