1997 Ford Taurus vs. 2001 Mazda Roadster
To start off, 2001 Mazda Roadster is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Ford Taurus. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Ford Taurus would be higher. At 2,962 cc (6 cylinders), 1997 Ford Taurus is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2001 Mazda Roadster is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2001 Mazda Roadster. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Ford Taurus, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1997 Ford Taurus | 2001 Mazda Roadster | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | Taurus | Roadster |
Year Released | 1997 | 2001 |
Body Type | Sedan | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2962 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 197 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5030 mm | 3930 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1750 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1230 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2270 mm |