1997 Ford Taurus vs. 2002 GMC Terra 4
To start off, 2002 GMC Terra 4 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Ford Taurus. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Ford Taurus would be higher.
Because 2002 GMC Terra 4 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 GMC Terra 4. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Ford Taurus, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1997 Ford Taurus | 2002 GMC Terra 4 | |
| Make | Ford | GMC |
| Model | Taurus | Terra 4 |
| Year Released | 1997 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2950 mm |
