1997 Ford Thunderbird vs. 1965 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow
To start off, 1997 Ford Thunderbird is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow would be higher. At 6,230 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow weights approximately 480 kg more than 1997 Ford Thunderbird.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1997 Ford Thunderbird | 1965 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow | |
Make | Ford | Rolls-Royce |
Model | Thunderbird | Silver Shadow |
Year Released | 1997 | 1965 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3791 cc | 6230 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 138 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1620 kg | 2100 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5090 mm | 5180 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 3040 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 109 L |