1997 Ford Thunderbird vs. 1972 Datsun 240Z

To start off, 1997 Ford Thunderbird is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Datsun 240Z. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Datsun 240Z would be higher. At 3,791 cc (6 cylinders), 1997 Ford Thunderbird is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Datsun 240Z (151 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 13 more horse power than 1997 Ford Thunderbird. (138 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1972 Datsun 240Z should accelerate faster than 1997 Ford Thunderbird. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Ford Thunderbird weights approximately 552 kg more than 1972 Datsun 240Z.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1997 Ford Thunderbird (291 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 93 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Datsun 240Z. (198 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 1997 Ford Thunderbird will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Datsun 240Z.

Compare all specifications:

1997 Ford Thunderbird 1972 Datsun 240Z
Make Ford Datsun
Model Thunderbird 240Z
Year Released 1997 1972
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3791 cc 2393 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 138 HP 151 HP
Engine RPM 3800 RPM 5600 RPM
Torque 291 Nm 198 Nm
Torque RPM 2400 RPM 4400 RPM
Engine Bore Size 96.8 mm 83 mm
Engine Stroke Size 86 mm 73.7 mm
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Rear
Number of Seats 4 seats 2 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 3 doors
Vehicle Weight 1620 kg 1068 kg
Vehicle Length 5090 mm 4140 mm
Vehicle Width 1850 mm 1630 mm
Wheelbase Size 2880 mm 2300 mm