1997 Ford Thunderbird vs. 2004 Jeep Wrangler
To start off, 2004 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Ford Thunderbird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Ford Thunderbird would be higher. At 4,599 cc (8 cylinders), 1997 Ford Thunderbird is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Jeep Wrangler weights approximately 2 kg more than 1997 Ford Thunderbird.
Because 2004 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1997 Ford Thunderbird. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1997 Ford Thunderbird | 2004 Jeep Wrangler | |
Make | Ford | Jeep |
Model | Thunderbird | Wrangler |
Year Released | 1997 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4599 cc | 3966 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 190 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1620 kg | 1622 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5050 mm | 3950 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1810 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2380 mm |