1997 Ford Thunderbird vs. 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander
To start off, 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Ford Thunderbird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Ford Thunderbird would be higher. At 3,791 cc (6 cylinders), 1997 Ford Thunderbird is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander (163 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 25 more horse power than 1997 Ford Thunderbird. (138 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander should accelerate faster than 1997 Ford Thunderbird. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Ford Thunderbird weights approximately 110 kg more than 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander.
Let's talk about torque, 1997 Ford Thunderbird (291 Nm) has 78 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander. (213 Nm). This means 1997 Ford Thunderbird will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander.
Compare all specifications:
1997 Ford Thunderbird | 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander | |
Make | Ford | Mitsubishi |
Model | Thunderbird | Outlander |
Year Released | 1997 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3791 cc | 2376 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 138 HP | 163 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 291 Nm | 213 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 96.8 mm | 87 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86 mm | 100 mm |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1620 kg | 1510 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5090 mm | 4550 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1690 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2760 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 59 L |