1997 Ford Thunderbird vs. 2009 Smart ForTwo
To start off, 2009 Smart ForTwo is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Ford Thunderbird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Ford Thunderbird would be higher. At 4,599 cc (8 cylinders), 1997 Ford Thunderbird is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1997 Ford Thunderbird | 2009 Smart ForTwo | |
Make | Ford | Smart |
Model | Thunderbird | ForTwo |
Year Released | 1997 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 4599 cc | 999 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 83 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5050 mm | 2700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1570 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 1870 mm |