1997 Ford Thunderbird vs. 2010 Jaguar XF
To start off, 2010 Jaguar XF is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Ford Thunderbird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Ford Thunderbird would be higher. At 3,791 cc (6 cylinders), 1997 Ford Thunderbird is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Jaguar XF (187 HP) has 49 more horse power than 1997 Ford Thunderbird. (138 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Jaguar XF should accelerate faster than 1997 Ford Thunderbird.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Jaguar XF (450 Nm) has 159 more torque (in Nm) than 1997 Ford Thunderbird. (291 Nm). This means 2010 Jaguar XF will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1997 Ford Thunderbird.
Compare all specifications:
| 1997 Ford Thunderbird | 2010 Jaguar XF | |
| Make | Ford | Jaguar |
| Model | Thunderbird | XF |
| Year Released | 1997 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3791 cc | 2200 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 138 HP | 187 HP |
| Torque | 291 Nm | 450 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 5090 mm | 4961 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1877 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1461 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2908 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 70 L |
