1997 Ford Tracer vs. 1963 Holden EJ
To start off, 1997 Ford Tracer is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Holden EJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Holden EJ would be higher. At 2,262 cc (6 cylinders), 1963 Holden EJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Ford Tracer (67 HP) has 3 more horse power than 1963 Holden EJ. (64 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1997 Ford Tracer should accelerate faster than 1963 Holden EJ. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Holden EJ weights approximately 169 kg more than 1997 Ford Tracer.
Because 1963 Holden EJ is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Holden EJ. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Ford Tracer, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1963 Holden EJ (163 Nm @ 1400 RPM) has 62 more torque (in Nm) than 1997 Ford Tracer. (101 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1963 Holden EJ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1997 Ford Tracer.
Compare all specifications:
1997 Ford Tracer | 1963 Holden EJ | |
Make | Ford | Holden |
Model | Tracer | EJ |
Year Released | 1997 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1321 cc | 2262 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 67 HP | 64 HP |
Torque | 101 Nm | 163 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 1400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 965 kg | 1134 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 4500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1480 mm |