1997 Ford Tracer vs. 2006 Smart ForTwo
To start off, 2006 Smart ForTwo is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Ford Tracer. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Ford Tracer would be higher. At 1,321 cc (4 cylinders), 1997 Ford Tracer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Smart ForTwo (74 HP) has 7 more horse power than 1997 Ford Tracer. (67 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Smart ForTwo should accelerate faster than 1997 Ford Tracer.
Because 2006 Smart ForTwo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Smart ForTwo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Ford Tracer, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Smart ForTwo (110 Nm @ 2200 RPM) has 9 more torque (in Nm) than 1997 Ford Tracer. (101 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2006 Smart ForTwo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1997 Ford Tracer.
Compare all specifications:
1997 Ford Tracer | 2006 Smart ForTwo | |
Make | Ford | Smart |
Model | Tracer | ForTwo |
Year Released | 1997 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 1321 cc | 698 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 67 HP | 74 HP |
Torque | 101 Nm | 110 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 2200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 965 kg | 965 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 2510 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1520 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1560 mm |