1997 Ford Windstar vs. 1962 Mercedes-Benz 300
To start off, 1997 Ford Windstar is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Mercedes-Benz 300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Mercedes-Benz 300 would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 1997 Ford Windstar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Mercedes-Benz 300 (158 HP @ 5300 RPM) has 8 more horse power than 1997 Ford Windstar. (150 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1962 Mercedes-Benz 300 should accelerate faster than 1997 Ford Windstar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Mercedes-Benz 300 weights approximately 240 kg more than 1997 Ford Windstar. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1962 Mercedes-Benz 300 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Mercedes-Benz 300. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Ford Windstar, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1997 Ford Windstar | 1962 Mercedes-Benz 300 | |
| Make | Ford | Mercedes-Benz |
| Model | Windstar | 300 |
| Year Released | 1997 | 1962 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3000 cc | 2996 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 150 HP | 158 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5300 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1690 kg | 1930 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5120 mm | 5200 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1920 mm | 1870 mm |
