1997 Ford Windstar vs. 1963 Lotus Elan
To start off, 1997 Ford Windstar is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Lotus Elan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Lotus Elan would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 1997 Ford Windstar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Ford Windstar (150 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 50 more horse power than 1963 Lotus Elan. (100 HP @ 5700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1997 Ford Windstar should accelerate faster than 1963 Lotus Elan. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Ford Windstar weights approximately 1096 kg more than 1963 Lotus Elan. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1963 Lotus Elan is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Lotus Elan. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Ford Windstar, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1997 Ford Windstar | 1963 Lotus Elan | |
Make | Ford | Lotus |
Model | Windstar | Elan |
Year Released | 1997 | 1963 |
Body Type | Minivan | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3000 cc | 1498 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 150 HP | 100 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5700 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1690 kg | 594 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5120 mm | 3700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1920 mm | 1430 mm |