1997 Ford Windstar vs. 1969 Triumph Herald
To start off, 1997 Ford Windstar is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Triumph Herald. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Triumph Herald would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 1997 Ford Windstar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Ford Windstar (150 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 112 more horse power than 1969 Triumph Herald. (38 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1997 Ford Windstar should accelerate faster than 1969 Triumph Herald. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Ford Windstar weights approximately 910 kg more than 1969 Triumph Herald. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1969 Triumph Herald is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Triumph Herald. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Ford Windstar, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1997 Ford Windstar | 1969 Triumph Herald | |
Make | Ford | Triumph |
Model | Windstar | Herald |
Year Released | 1997 | 1969 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3000 cc | 1145 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 150 HP | 38 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1690 kg | 780 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5120 mm | 3890 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1920 mm | 1530 mm |