1997 Ford Windstar vs. 2009 Jaguar XF
To start off, 2009 Jaguar XF is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Ford Windstar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Ford Windstar would be higher. At 4,196 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Jaguar XF is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Jaguar XF (410 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 260 more horse power than 1997 Ford Windstar. (150 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Jaguar XF should accelerate faster than 1997 Ford Windstar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Jaguar XF weights approximately 152 kg more than 1997 Ford Windstar. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2009 Jaguar XF is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Jaguar XF. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Ford Windstar, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1997 Ford Windstar | 2009 Jaguar XF | |
Make | Ford | Jaguar |
Model | Windstar | XF |
Year Released | 1997 | 2009 |
Body Type | Minivan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3000 cc | 4196 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 150 HP | 410 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1690 kg | 1842 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5120 mm | 4970 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1920 mm | 1470 mm |