1997 Ford Windstar vs. 2010 Chevrolet Suburban
To start off, 2010 Chevrolet Suburban is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Ford Windstar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Ford Windstar would be higher. At 5,300 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Chevrolet Suburban is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Chevrolet Suburban (320 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 170 more horse power than 1997 Ford Windstar. (150 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Chevrolet Suburban should accelerate faster than 1997 Ford Windstar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Chevrolet Suburban weights approximately 853 kg more than 1997 Ford Windstar. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2010 Chevrolet Suburban is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2010 Chevrolet Suburban. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Ford Windstar, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1997 Ford Windstar | 2010 Chevrolet Suburban | |
Make | Ford | Chevrolet |
Model | Windstar | Suburban |
Year Released | 1997 | 2010 |
Body Type | Minivan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3000 cc | 5300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 150 HP | 320 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1690 kg | 2543 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5120 mm | 5649 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1920 mm | 2009 mm |