1997 Ford Windstar vs. 2012 Suzuki Kizashi
To start off, 2012 Suzuki Kizashi is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Ford Windstar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Ford Windstar would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 1997 Ford Windstar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Suzuki Kizashi (185 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 35 more horse power than 1997 Ford Windstar. (150 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Suzuki Kizashi should accelerate faster than 1997 Ford Windstar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Ford Windstar weights approximately 220 kg more than 2012 Suzuki Kizashi.
Because 2012 Suzuki Kizashi is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1997 Ford Windstar. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Suzuki Kizashi will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1997 Ford Windstar | 2012 Suzuki Kizashi | |
| Make | Ford | Suzuki |
| Model | Windstar | Kizashi |
| Year Released | 1997 | 2012 |
| Body Type | Minivan | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3000 cc | 2400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 150 HP | 185 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | AWD |
| Vehicle Weight | 1690 kg | 1470 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5120 mm | 4651 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1920 mm | 1821 mm |
