1997 GMC Sonoma vs. 2010 Chevrolet Epica
To start off, 2010 Chevrolet Epica is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 GMC Sonoma. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 GMC Sonoma would be higher. At 4,294 cc (6 cylinders), 1997 GMC Sonoma is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1997 GMC Sonoma is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1997 GMC Sonoma. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Chevrolet Epica, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2010 Chevrolet Epica has automatic transmission and 1997 GMC Sonoma has manual transmission. 1997 GMC Sonoma will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Chevrolet Epica will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1997 GMC Sonoma | 2010 Chevrolet Epica | |
| Make | GMC | Chevrolet |
| Model | Sonoma | Epica |
| Year Released | 1997 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Pickup | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4294 cc | 2490 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 154 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 6 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
