1997 GMC Sonoma vs. 2010 Mazda 2
To start off, 2010 Mazda 2 is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 GMC Sonoma. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 GMC Sonoma would be higher. At 4,294 cc (6 cylinders), 1997 GMC Sonoma is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1997 GMC Sonoma is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1997 GMC Sonoma. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Mazda 2, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1997 GMC Sonoma | 2010 Mazda 2 | |
Make | GMC | Mazda |
Model | Sonoma | 2 |
Year Released | 1997 | 2010 |
Body Type | Pickup | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4294 cc | 1498 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 102 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |