1997 Holden Nova vs. 1968 Lotus Elan
To start off, 1997 Holden Nova is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Lotus Elan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Lotus Elan would be higher. At 1,587 cc (4 cylinders), 1997 Holden Nova is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Holden Nova (106 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 2 more horse power than 1968 Lotus Elan. (104 HP @ 6250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1997 Holden Nova should accelerate faster than 1968 Lotus Elan. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Holden Nova weights approximately 635 kg more than 1968 Lotus Elan. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1968 Lotus Elan is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Lotus Elan. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Holden Nova, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1997 Holden Nova | 1968 Lotus Elan | |
Make | Holden | Lotus |
Model | Nova | Elan |
Year Released | 1997 | 1968 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1587 cc | 1558 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 106 HP | 104 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1065 kg | 430 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4100 mm | 3360 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1430 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1100 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2240 mm |