1997 Holden Nova vs. 2000 Lotus Extreme
To start off, 2000 Lotus Extreme is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Holden Nova. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Holden Nova would be higher. At 1,587 cc (4 cylinders), 1997 Holden Nova is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Lotus Extreme (120 HP @ 7800 RPM) has 14 more horse power than 1997 Holden Nova. (106 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Lotus Extreme should accelerate faster than 1997 Holden Nova. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Holden Nova weights approximately 609 kg more than 2000 Lotus Extreme.
Because 2000 Lotus Extreme is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Lotus Extreme. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Holden Nova, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Lotus Extreme (180 Nm) has 45 more torque (in Nm) than 1997 Holden Nova. (135 Nm). This means 2000 Lotus Extreme will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1997 Holden Nova.
Compare all specifications:
1997 Holden Nova | 2000 Lotus Extreme | |
Make | Holden | Lotus |
Model | Nova | Extreme |
Year Released | 1997 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1587 cc | 700 cc |
Horse Power | 106 HP | 120 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 7800 RPM |
Torque | 135 Nm | 180 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1065 kg | 456 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4100 mm | 3510 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1810 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2420 mm |