1997 Honda CRX vs. 2010 Mercedes-Benz ML
To start off, 2010 Mercedes-Benz ML is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Honda CRX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Honda CRX would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Mercedes-Benz ML is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Mercedes-Benz ML weights approximately 1330 kg more than 1997 Honda CRX.
Because 2010 Mercedes-Benz ML is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1997 Honda CRX. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Mercedes-Benz ML will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1997 Honda CRX | 2010 Mercedes-Benz ML | |
Make | Honda | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | CRX | ML |
Year Released | 1997 | 2010 |
Body Type | Hatchback | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1668 cc | 3500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 125 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | AWD |
Transmission Type | Manual | CVT |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1050 kg | 2380 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4010 mm | 4780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1910 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1260 mm | 1816 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2913 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 90 L |