1997 Isuzu 3.1 vs. 2005 Mazda 6
To start off, 2005 Mazda 6 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Isuzu 3.1. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Isuzu 3.1 would be higher. At 3,098 cc (4 cylinders), 1997 Isuzu 3.1 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1997 Isuzu 3.1 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2005 Mazda 6. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Isuzu 3.1 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1997 Isuzu 3.1 has automatic transmission and 2005 Mazda 6 has manual transmission. 2005 Mazda 6 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1997 Isuzu 3.1 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1997 Isuzu 3.1 | 2005 Mazda 6 | |
| Make | Isuzu | Mazda |
| Model | 3.1 | 6 |
| Year Released | 1997 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3098 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 119 HP |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Diesel |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
