1997 Isuzu 3.1 vs. 2012 Ford Mustang
To start off, 2012 Ford Mustang is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Isuzu 3.1. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Isuzu 3.1 would be higher. At 5,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1997 Isuzu 3.1 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 Ford Mustang. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Isuzu 3.1 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1997 Isuzu 3.1 has automatic transmission and 2012 Ford Mustang has manual transmission. 2012 Ford Mustang will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1997 Isuzu 3.1 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1997 Isuzu 3.1 | 2012 Ford Mustang | |
| Make | Isuzu | Ford |
| Model | 3.1 | Mustang |
| Year Released | 1997 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3098 cc | 5000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 412 HP |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed manual |
| Number of Seats | 7 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
