1997 Isuzu 3.1 vs. 2012 Toyota Sequoia
To start off, 2012 Toyota Sequoia is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Isuzu 3.1. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Isuzu 3.1 would be higher. At 5,700 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 Toyota Sequoia is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1997 Isuzu 3.1 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 Toyota Sequoia. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Isuzu 3.1 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1997 Isuzu 3.1 | 2012 Toyota Sequoia | |
Make | Isuzu | Toyota |
Model | 3.1 | Sequoia |
Year Released | 1997 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3098 cc | 5700 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 381 HP |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |