1997 Jaguar XK vs. 1972 Jaguar XJ
To start off, 1997 Jaguar XK is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Jaguar XJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Jaguar XJ would be higher. At 5,344 cc (12 cylinders), 1972 Jaguar XJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Jaguar XK (290 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 25 more horse power than 1972 Jaguar XJ. (265 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1997 Jaguar XK should accelerate faster than 1972 Jaguar XJ. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 Jaguar XJ weights approximately 180 kg more than 1997 Jaguar XK.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1997 Jaguar XK | 1972 Jaguar XJ | |
Make | Jaguar | Jaguar |
Model | XK | XJ |
Year Released | 1997 | 1972 |
Body Type | Convertible | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3994 cc | 5344 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 290 HP | 265 HP |
Engine RPM | 6100 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1700 kg | 1880 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 4830 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2590 mm | 2770 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 90 L |