1997 Jaguar XK8 vs. 1964 Mini MK I

To start off, 1997 Jaguar XK8 is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Mini MK I. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Mini MK I would be higher. At 3,996 cc (8 cylinders), 1997 Jaguar XK8 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Jaguar XK8 (290 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 256 more horse power than 1964 Mini MK I. (34 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1997 Jaguar XK8 should accelerate faster than 1964 Mini MK I.

Because 1997 Jaguar XK8 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1997 Jaguar XK8. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1964 Mini MK I, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1997 Jaguar XK8 (393 Nm) has 333 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Mini MK I. (60 Nm). This means 1997 Jaguar XK8 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Mini MK I. 1997 Jaguar XK8 has automatic transmission and 1964 Mini MK I has manual transmission. 1964 Mini MK I will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1997 Jaguar XK8 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: