1997 Jeep Cherokee vs. 1966 Triumph 2000
To start off, 1997 Jeep Cherokee is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 2,463 cc (4 cylinders), 1997 Jeep Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Jeep Cherokee (120 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 29 more horse power than 1966 Triumph 2000. (91 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1997 Jeep Cherokee should accelerate faster than 1966 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Jeep Cherokee weights approximately 210 kg more than 1966 Triumph 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1997 Jeep Cherokee (194 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 36 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Triumph 2000. (158 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1997 Jeep Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
1997 Jeep Cherokee | 1966 Triumph 2000 | |
Make | Jeep | Triumph |
Model | Cherokee | 2000 |
Year Released | 1997 | 1966 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2463 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 120 HP | 91 HP |
Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 194 Nm | 158 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 98.3 mm | 74.7 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 81 mm | 76 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1380 kg | 1170 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4260 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1640 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2700 mm |