1997 Jeep Cherokee vs. 2010 Mazda 3

To start off, 2010 Mazda 3 is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Jeep Cherokee. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Jeep Cherokee would be higher. At 2,463 cc (4 cylinders), 1997 Jeep Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Jeep Cherokee (120 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 16 more horse power than 2010 Mazda 3. (104 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1997 Jeep Cherokee should accelerate faster than 2010 Mazda 3.

Because 1997 Jeep Cherokee is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1997 Jeep Cherokee. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Mazda 3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1997 Jeep Cherokee (194 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 49 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Mazda 3. (145 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 1997 Jeep Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Mazda 3.

Compare all specifications:

1997 Jeep Cherokee 2010 Mazda 3
Make Jeep Mazda
Model Cherokee 3
Year Released 1997 2010
Body Type SUV Hatchback
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2463 cc 1560 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 120 HP 104 HP
Engine RPM 5400 RPM 6000 RPM
Torque 194 Nm 145 Nm
Torque RPM 3500 RPM 4500 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Front
Transmission Type Manual 5-speed manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 5 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Length 4260 mm 4590 mm
Vehicle Width 1730 mm 1755 mm
Vehicle Height 1640 mm 1471 mm
Wheelbase Size 2580 mm 2639 mm