1997 Jeep Dakar vs. 2013 Ford Mustang
To start off, 2013 Ford Mustang is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Jeep Dakar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Jeep Dakar would be higher. At 4,000 cc (6 cylinders), 1997 Jeep Dakar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Ford Mustang (301 HP) has 111 more horse power than 1997 Jeep Dakar. (190 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1997 Jeep Dakar.
Because 2013 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2013 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Jeep Dakar, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1997 Jeep Dakar has automatic transmission and 2013 Ford Mustang has manual transmission. 2013 Ford Mustang will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1997 Jeep Dakar will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1997 Jeep Dakar | 2013 Ford Mustang | |
Make | Jeep | Ford |
Model | Dakar | Mustang |
Year Released | 1997 | 2013 |
Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4000 cc | 3700 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 190 HP | 301 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4240 mm | 4778 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 2035 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1910 mm | 1412 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2720 mm |