1997 Jeep Icon vs. 1981 Seat Ritmo
To start off, 1997 Jeep Icon is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Seat Ritmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Seat Ritmo would be higher. At 2,399 cc (4 cylinders), 1997 Jeep Icon is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1997 Jeep Icon is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1997 Jeep Icon. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1981 Seat Ritmo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1997 Jeep Icon | 1981 Seat Ritmo | |
Make | Jeep | Seat |
Model | Icon | Ritmo |
Year Released | 1997 | 1981 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2399 cc | 1197 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 63 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 3610 mm | 3950 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1790 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2460 mm |