1997 Jeep Icon vs. 2004 Renault Grand Scenic
To start off, 2004 Renault Grand Scenic is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Jeep Icon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Jeep Icon would be higher. At 2,399 cc (4 cylinders), 1997 Jeep Icon is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1997 Jeep Icon is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1997 Jeep Icon. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Renault Grand Scenic, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1997 Jeep Icon | 2004 Renault Grand Scenic | |
Make | Jeep | Renault |
Model | Icon | Grand Scenic |
Year Released | 1997 | 2004 |
Body Type | SUV | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2399 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 161 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3610 mm | 4500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1790 mm | 1640 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2690 mm |