1997 Jeep Icon vs. 2005 Mitsubishi Colt
To start off, 2005 Mitsubishi Colt is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Jeep Icon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Jeep Icon would be higher. At 2,972 cc, 2005 Mitsubishi Colt is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1997 Jeep Icon | 2005 Mitsubishi Colt | |
Make | Jeep | Mitsubishi |
Model | Icon | Colt |
Year Released | 1997 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2399 cc | 2972 cc |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 179 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2970 mm |